Todays Justice System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Todays Justice System - Essay ExampleHowever, there is no denying the fact that umpire also happens to be a highly subjective concept, which is often susceptible to diverse interpretations. What may seem just to a person or a group may sound unjust or partial to many other. In that context, it will be interesting to have a look into the concept of evaluator as per Confucius, Machiavelli and Lao-tzu, to facilitate a bit better understanding of the contemporary justice system.The Confucian concept of justice is woven around the whimsy of gong, which if roughly translated means impartiality (Cleary, 2000). Hence, Confucian dogmas strongly instruct the domain and the justice system to resolve and solve the social conflicts and differences without resorting to any sort or phase of discrimination or partiality. According to Confucius, the overall mind of direction and moral health of any society depends on the extent to which virtue and uprightness sway to permeate the social, comm ercial and personal spheres of life (Cleary, 2000). Therefore, the people only tend to develop a strong affinity with propriety if there prevails a sense of justice in any society. ... Therefore, the people only tend to develop a strong affinity with propriety if there prevails a sense of justice in any society. It is understood that justice to Confucius meant absolute fairness and total absence of any sort of favoritism. Thus, in the given context, the fair and equitable dispersal and allocation of national resources and opportunities of growth constitute an integral part of the Confucian concept of justice (Cleary, 2000). Confucius favor a concept of justice that distinctly favored the marginalized and weaker sections of the society and ensured their well being and safety. Contrary to Confucius, the Machiavellian concept of justice is blatantly opportunistic. Machiavelli holds that the means are always subservient to the ends (Machiavelli, 1984). Thus, the direct premise of this argumentation of reasoning is that the state or the political authority can resort to any line of action while dispensing justice, provide the delivered verdict or death aid and abets the political authority in achieving its coveted and vested aims and objectives (Machiavelli, 1984). Therefore, according to the Machiavellian notion of justice, justice does not happen to be a means to beam a sense of fairness in the society, but a wight to further the interests of those in power. Justice merely dwindles to being a convenient tool rather then being an exalted institution and a reliable pillar of social stability. To Machiavelli, virtue and fairness meant any thing that furthered the narrow interests of the state (Machiavelli, 1984). In the Machiavellian concept of justice, preservation and protection of the realm takes preponderance over everything else.Lao-Tzus concept